Good AI Review: Is It Really As Smart As It Claims?

The flood of AI tools over the past few years feels endless. Every week, a new AI content creation tool promises to make either your professional or personal life easier.

AI humanizers claim to balance human and machine-made content, and detectors exist to verify what’s authentic.

All of these seem to share the same pitch, however, which is promising to deliver the best results. 

Out of the sea of other platforms, Good AI caught my attention. Not because of its flashy marketing or wild claims, but the opposite—the lack of hype.

Tucked inside their suite is Ghost AI, a humanizer tool that looks to make AI-written content sound more natural.

---

Önemli Çıkarımlar

• Good AI’s main site offers AI Essay Writer and AI Essay Outliner.

• Also provides humanization and detection tools via the Ghost AI platform.

• Humanizer performs reasonably well.

• AI detector is less reliable.

• Fiyatlandırma is competitive and aligns with industry standards.

• Testing showed that humanized content may still be flagged by some detectors.

• For AI content that consistently passes detection across multiple platforms, further solutions may be needed.

---

What Is Good AI?

Good AI is one of those companies that tries to build it all. They built an AI humanizer. They built an AI detector.

They were probably two steps away from building a coffee maker too, before someone stopped them.

Overview of Good AI

Their main product is called Ghost AI, which you can find at the-ghost-ai.com, or in the footer of the main Good AI site under “Humanizer.”

Since we’re not focusing on essays specifically, we’ll be homing in on Ghost AI in this article.

Ghost AI has a tool that functions as both a humanizer and a detector—not two separate ones. Its purpose is to rewrite AI-generated content so it reads more naturally.

And simultaneously, it’s supposed to catch AI-generated content when it sees it.

If that sounds contradictory to you, congratulations. You’re paying attention.

It’s like being a locksmith who also teaches people how to pick locks. Sure, you know how both sides operate. But are you really incentivized to make those locks that strong?

Key Features of Good AI’s Ghost AI

Let’s talk features. Ghost AI comes with the usual suspects:

• The Humanizer: Takes your robotic AI prose and makes it sound like a real person wrote it. It analyzes patterns, adjusts sentence structure, and throws in some variety. The goal is to help you fly under the radar of AI detectors.
• The Detector: Scans text and tells you whether it thinks AI wrote it. Uses machine learning models trained on thousands of examples. Supposedly can spot the telltale signs that separate human writing from AI prose.
• Bulk Processing: You can feed it multiple documents at once. Helpful if you’re churning out content at scale and don’t want to spend your entire day copying and pasting.
• Browser Extension: Install it directly in your browser for quick access. No need to navigate to their website every time you want to humanize something.
• API Erişimi: For the developers out there who want to integrate this into their own workflows. Because apparently, we’re all building our own AI ecosystems now.

The interface is clean and simple. Maybe too simple. It’s got that “we spent all our money on the backend” vibe, which isn’t necessarily bad. You’d rather have a tool that works than a tool that looks pretty.

But what caught our eye was that they play both offense and defense, meaning that they offer both detection ve humanizing functions in one tool.

The issue is that their detection model isn’t strong enough to reliably validate the output from their own humanizer.

Good AI Pricing and Plans

Good AI’s pricing won’t make you spit out your coffee. 

It’s actually pretty reasonable compared to what else is out there. But since we’re looking at the detector and humanizer today, we’ll focus on the pricing for those tools specifically.

Good AI offers two main tiers:

1. Personal Plan: Priced at $9/month, this plan claims to provide “unlimited words” per month. However, a section on their page specifies a 20k-word limit, which creates confusion regarding the actual usage amount. Despite this, the plan includes both AI Humanization and AI Detection, as well as 24/7 support.
2. API Plan: This plan includes both AI Humanization and Detection as well, but offers flexible token packages based on word count, starting at $20 for 100,000 words, and scaling up to $1,000 for 10 million words. It’s more suitable for high-volume users.

While the pricing scales linearly, some users may find the “unlimited words” claim misleading due to the 20k-word limit in the fine print.

Good AI provides a straightforward, affordable solution for casual users but may lack clarity for those expecting true “unlimited” usage.

In comparison to other services, Good AI sits comfortably in the middle. It isn’t the cheapest or most expensive, offering a balanced solution that caters to most users without being particularly remarkable.

Good AI Accuracy and Reliability

Okay, time for the fun part. The actual testing.

We didn’t just take Good AI’s word for it. That would be like asking a politician if they’re trustworthy.

Instead, we ran our own tests using a methodology inspired by ZDNet'in karşılaştırma ölçütü for AI detectors.

Here’s what we did:

We gathered two sets of content. First set: written by actual humans. Second set: generated entirely by GPT-4. Then we ran both sets through Good AI’s detector and Undetectable AI’s detector to see how they performed.

İki kısa örnek hazırladık:

• Human-written content (original text drafted without AI assistance)
• GPT-generated content (text written entirely by ChatGPT)

Sonuçlar

İçerik Türü	Good AI Result	Tespit Edilemeyen AI Sonucu	Doğru mu?
İnsan-Yazısı	Detected as AI	95% Likely Human	❌ Good AI Failed✅ Undetectable Passed
GPT Tarafından Oluşturulan	Detected as AI	89% AI Probability	✅ İkisi de Doğru

The differences are clear.

Tespit Edilemeyen Yapay Zeka correctly identified the human-written sample as human, while Good AI/Ghost AI incorrectly flagged it as AI.

When testing the GPT-written text, both detectors marked it as AI, but Undetectable AI provided a clearer probability score and a sentence-level explanation.

Good AI Detector – Human Written Result

Undetectable AI Detector – Human Written Result

Good AI Detector – GPT Output Result

Undetectable AI Detector – GPT Output Result

This outcome makes the difference crystal clear: Tespit Edilemeyen Yapay Zeka belongs to the group of detectors that consistently achieve perfect or near-perfect accuracy.

Good AI, in contrast, demonstrates serious gaps that could lead to major misclassification when evaluating AI-generated content.

Additionally, Undetectable AI can verify if your text sounds human and correct any sections that are flagged. More on that with one of the best humanizers in the world, later in this article.

Pros and Cons of Good AI

Let’s break this down honestly.

Artıları

• The humanizer improves flow and reduces robotic phrasing.
• The interface is simple and easy to use.
• Pricing is affordable for casual users.
• Bulk processing helps handle multiple documents fast.
• Offers both detection and humanization in one tool.

Eksiler

• The detector incorrectly flagged human-written content as AI, which becomes a problem when the tool can’t validate the output from its own humanizer.
• The “unlimited words” claim conflicts with the 20k limit shown on their page.
• The humanizer doesn’t consistently pass stronger AI detectors.

The biggest con isn’t that they offer both a humanizer and a detector. Plenty of platforms do that, including Undetectable AI. The issue is how Good AI manages the two.

Their detector isn’t strong enough to validate their own humanizer, and their humanizer isn’t consistent enough to beat stronger detectors.

Undetectable also offers both detection and humanization, but it checks content against multiple detection models instead of relying on just one. This makes its humanizer more consistent across different detectors. 

Good AI doesn’t offer that cross-model approach, which is why their detector and humanizer perform inconsistently when tested together.

Good AI vs Undetectable AI

Time for the head-to-head comparison everyone needs.

We took the same GPT-generated article and put it through both humanizers. Then we tested the results with GPTZero.

Ghost AI humanized version: Passed 

Undetectable AI humanized version: Passed

It’s a tie. Both tools successfully made the content look human to GPTZero.

Now, this is where things diverge. Undetectable AI’s detector detected the Ghost AI humanized content. But it didn’t catch its own humanized content.

Ghost AI humanized version: Failed Undetectable AI humanized version: Passed

Now, you might think that’s unfair. Of course Undetectable AI’s humanizer would pass its own detector. That’s like grading your own homework.

But here’s the thing: Undetectable AI’s detector is demonstrably more accurate than Ghost AI’s detector. Remember earlier? When we tested human content, Undetectable AI correctly identified it as human 100% of the time. 

Ghost AI didn’t.

So it’s not just about one tool favoring its own output. It’s about one tool being objectively better at detection and humanization.

Beyond just passing detection, there’s the question of quality. Does the humanized content still make sense? Is it readable?

Both tools maintained coherence. Neither turned the content into word salad. But Undetectable AI’s output felt more natural. The sentence flow was better. The word choice was more varied.

Ghost AI’s humanizer sometimes made weird substitutions. It would replace simple words with unnecessarily complex ones. Or it would restructure sentences in ways that technically worked but felt awkward.

If you’re serious about creating AI content that passes detection, you need tools that are proven to work across multiple detection systems.

Undetectable AI offers the AI Paraphraser and AI Stealth Writer, specifically designed to edit AI-generated content so it evades detection reliably.

Not just sometimes. Not just with specific detectors. Consistently and reliably.

• Bu AI Paraphraser rewrites flagged sections while maintaining your original meaning. 
• Bu Yapay Zeka Gizli Yazarı takes a more comprehensive approach, restructuring entire documents to eliminate AI signatures.

And critically, they’re backed by a detector that actually works, so you can verify your content passes detection before you publish it.

That’s the workflow that makes sense. Generate with AI, humanize with tools that work, and verify with an accurate detector. Ghost AI only gets you two out of three.

Yapay Zeka Dedektörümüzü ve İnsancıllaştırıcımızı aşağıdaki widget'ta deneyin!

Good AI or Just Okay AI?

Is Good AI as smart as it claims to be?

The honest answer: kind of, but not really.

Their humanizer does an okay job. It’ll get you past some detectors. But “some detectors” isn’t good enough when your content’s credibility is on the line.

Their detector is actively bad. It’s wrong more often than it’s right. Using it is worse than not using a detector at all because at least you know that you don’t know.

The pricing is fair. The interface is clean. The bulk processing is helpful. These are all good things.

Yet here’s the reality. If you’re going to use AI to create content, you need tools that work consistently. Not tools that work sometimes. Not tools that work if you’re lucky.

Good AI is a decent budget option if you’re just testing the waters. If you want to see what humanization looks like without committing serious money, and are not too worried about passing every detector.

But if you’re building a content strategy that relies on AI-generated text that can’t be detected, you need something more robust.

You need a humanizer that consistently beats multiple detection systems and that’s actually accurate, so you can verify your work.

İhtiyacınız olan Tespit Edilemeyen Yapay Zeka. 

Good AI isn’t bad. It’s just not good enough.

And in this game, good enough doesn’t cut it.